You don’t have to be a prince accused of doing very bad things to discover that in any challenging situation you need to be ready for a range of different types of questions.
More on Prince Andrew and the art of kamikaze-style interview responses later….

But anyone facing media interviews – or other forms of professional questioning from job interviews to official inquiries – should be prepared for BOTH hard questions and soft ones.
Astute followers of this column may be familiar with the term “blowtorch-on-the-belly” questioning. 



This originated in the hard-bitten world of Australian political journalism from where I hail.
However it’s not just “blowtorch-on-the-belly” questions which bring some badly-prepared, under-prepared or under-trained accident-prone interviewees unstuck.
When readying yourself for a media interview or other questioning, you also have to ensure you don’t dig a hole for yourself on softer inquiries which may seem more like “tickle-on-the-tummy” questions.
These could be characterised, not by blowtorches, but by tickle sticks – the kind of soft laughter-instigating props wielded by the dearly departed comedian Ken Dodd.


In “Great Answers To Tough Questions At Work” I make the point that soft questions can sometimes trip people up.
This happened, for example, when the law-bending U.S. President Richard Nixon was famously being interviewed about the Watergate corruption scandal by Britain’s charming David Frost.


In my book, I describe David Frost as an interviewer who was often “more a gentle tickler than a blowtorcher”.
And it was a less than forceful Frost question which prompted one of the most memorable, damaging and self-incriminating answers of all – though Prince Andrew has now provided tough competition.
It was a remarkably gentle question which led to Richard Nixon giving his infamous answer: “When the president does it, that means it’s not illegal.”
Next time you’re questioned professionally, make sure you’re ready for the both the blowtorch and the tickle stick.


It was splendid to be reminded of the comedian who used to be on the safe end of the tickle stick during my latest training mission to Ken Dodd’s home city of Liverpool in England’s north-west.
Here Ken Dodd is immortalised on Liverpool’s Lime Street Station – with his tickle stick helpfully being pointed out by another passing Dodd who was in town to run “Your Message In 60 Seconds” and “Give Great Answers To Tough Questions.”


The tough question for the Dodd on the left is: “Based on Ken Dodd’s distinctive looks, isn’t it true that you must be related to him?”


But perhaps more significantly than his (horror) movie star looks which was the source of much of his comedy, Ken Dodd was an entertaining interviewee who generally made sure he was well prepared for his questioners and the wider audience beyond.
In this video he’s being interviewed about his tickling stick – and making a couple of serious points about comedy – with a few subtly amusing lines thrown in along the way.



Here he is telling stories from his life – including the time he got the Queen moving in her seat (though Prince Andrew has probably managed to get the Queen moving in her seat a different way in of late).




Ken Dodd had the virtue of taking his work seriously, but without taking himself too seriously.
He once claimed that his comedy act was very educational, providing as evidence: “I heard a man leaving the other night, saying: ‘Well that taught me a lesson’.”
Whether or not the Ken Dodd-style of old-fashioned comedy appeals to you, he went into interviews armed with plenty on his agenda that he could say if the opportunity arose.
In media training sessions, we make sure you develop your own well-thought out agenda ahead of any encounter with a journalist.
This ensures that you have a range of well-tested and well-worded useful things to say on any topic likely to be raised.
Media training can be done one-to-one – in person or over the phone – or in small groups.
Or when a larger team needs to communicate more inspriationally – with journalists, prospects, customers, officials and others – you can book one of the conference keynotes or master classes set out here:


Alas it’s now too late for all this potential guidance to help Prince Andrew in his latest on camera performance.
When the editor of the Royal Central website, Charlie Proctor, assessed the prince’s BBC interview responses to allegations relating to his friendship with the convicted sex offender Geoffrey Epstein, he was perhaps using masterly understatement.
Mr Proctor tweeted: “I expected a train wreck. That was a plane crashing into an oil tanker, causing a tsunami, triggering a nuclear explosion level bad.”
You can work out whether this assessment is too soft by watching the whole thing on BBC’s Newsnight special at:


It’s hard to know where to start in advising readers on how to avoid such a media catastrophe.
But if you ever find yourself in a position where a major broadcaster is prepared to devote an entire programme to your responses to allegations against you, I suggest you:

  • Do a comprehensive media training test interview beforehand and get your colleagues to critique it before deciding whether it’s wise to go ahead with a real interview


  • Use the test interview to help ensure you learn to avoid saying things like “That is what I would describe as me in that photo” and worse


  • Go into the interview with a big headline message which, while defending what is defensible, admits how sorry you are for anything relevant that you’ve done wrong and express profound regret about harm to any victims who may have been adversely affected by what you’ve done – backed up by practical action steps to seek to make up for the wrongs


  • Never seek to justify the totally indefensible by saying things like the friendship with a human trafficker helped you meet “useful” people


  • Don’t seek to explain staying for days in a house owned by a convicted sex offender, saying you were “too honourable” and it would have been “chicken” to have phoned to make your point


  • Avoid questionable use of euphemism, such as describing the behaviour of a convicted sex offender as merely “unbecoming”


  • While sticking to exact truths, beware of lines that are destined to be ridiculed – such as that you couldn’t possibly have done what you’re accused of because you have “weird” recollections of being at a Pizza Express on the same day.

However much you admire comedians – like Ken Dodd in the past or those of the present day – don’t go out of your way to give them material that will run and run and run.
Comedians with and without tickle sticks are quite capable of coming up with their own material without generous gifts from you.